Cao MK, Chen XY, Shen QY, Fan Z. Giant esophageal fibrovascular polyp with use of Sengstaken-Blakemore tube during surgery: A case report. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2026; 18(10): 126399 [DOI: 10.4253/wjge.126399]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a credible open-access journal focused on gastrointestinal endoscopy, indexed in ESCI, PubMed, and PubMed Central. Its most notable strength is the fast and efficient peer review and publication process. Editorial handling was timely, reviewer comments were specific and constructive, and accepted articles were published online quickly, allowing research to reach readers and enter the citation stream promptly. The open-access format ensures free global accessibility. I found no significant shortcomings and would consider submitting again and recommend the journal to colleagues in the field.